This whole activity is thanks to some recent interactions I've had with Paul Salomon of Math Munch and Lost in Recursion. A couple days ago, Paul posted a photo of some amazing stars he designed and manufactured himself, using a laser cutter to and 1/4" plexiglass. Aren't they cool?

I showed them to my daughter and although we both thought they were super cool, we also wondered what in the heck was going on there? I noticed that the bottom row would fit into the centers of the top row, and I counted twelve sides and twelve rays/points in each star, but other than that I couldn't figure it out. Paul was nice enough to explain it to me:

*"The top row is every possible 12-pointed star. The bottom row is the cutout dodecagon that fits in the middle. Starting on the right we have a dodecagon (every line goes over one corner); then on the next one 2 hexagons (lines go over two corners); then 3 squares (lines go over 3); then 4 triangles (lines go over 4); then a single-pieced 12-pointed star (go over 5); then a a 6-line asterisk (lines go over 6). Make sense?"*

It did make sense, but only in a fuzzy sort of way. I was still incredibly curious about what kind of math this was. I thought I saw some geometry (shapes, right?) but I suspected it was more than that. Here's what Paul told me:

*"Geometry yes, but it also has connections to number theory. If you do this with 13 points, for example, every star comes in one piece (nothing like 3 squares), and that's because 13 is prime! It's a cool question to work on. If I have 10 points and I go over 4 points, how many pieces will I end up with? Images like this also come up in group theory, a branch of modern abstract algebra.*

Paul's patient explanation included a link to Vi Hart's video on doodling stars which was really helpful and a very cool star applet for playing around with different permutations (or is that combinations?) of points and lines. As always, I started thinking about how my daughter and I could explore these ideas together.

**I have my own inquiry separate from hers, but it always seems to come back to one question: How can I use this new information with a seven year old in a way that is mathematically meaningful?**

Tah Dah!

I used the star applet Paul recommended to make a 3 star into 6, then 9, then 12 etc. and then put them side by side on the same sheet of paper. My thought was that it might be an interesting visual way to explore multiplication and groups (for example, 1 group of 3, 2 groups of 3, etc.) as well as part to whole. Basically I had no specific ideas about how we were going to explore the sheet until we started, but I think, for the first try, it worked out rather well. Here's how things went down this morning:

Me: We're going to do something with the number three. There are three of one thing that we're going to add to another three and see what it looks like then. Sort of like multiplication.

Kid: I already know how to do that.

Me: I know, but this is a new and different way to think about it all plus we can use your new colored pencils! So, let's look at this first triangle. What can you find three of?

She quickly found each point/corner, which she spontaneously marked with blue colored pencil, a move that completely influenced the way I guided the lesson from that point on. I've used geometry words with her in the past and I asked if she remembered the word for what we were calling a corner. She didn't so I had her write down the word vertex. Then I wondered if she could find something else there was three of in the triangle. She took her orange pencil and marked the sides, and then I had her write down the word 'edge'. I thought we were done, but she suddenly found the interior angles and marked them with a pencil. Awesome.

On the second star I said, "Now we're going to see what happens when two of the same triangles are put together. What do you notice?" She started counting individual points and found there were six. To clarify the 'groups of three' I asked her to find one triangle to trace -- it took a minute but she finally figured it out and, after that she quickly found the second triangle which she traced out in blue.

Me: So, since there are now two triangles, we have two groups of three. How much is that all together?

She wrote down the number six inside the star using both the blue and orange which I was pretty happy to see. I would have never even thought to prompt her in that direction, but it was a clear indication that she understood the number was a combination of two different numbers. As you'll notice, she continued this practice all the way through the 18 pointed star.

Me: So, the next star is three groups of three. Let's outline each triangle. [This was challenging for her visually, but a good kind of challenge.]

Then it was time to move on to the next row. Instead of tracing each individual triangle I suggested putting the same colored dot on each of the three points of any given triangle. The first time she did this it took some concentration. The second time she did a star this way it was no problem and she also started to notice that the colors went around the star in a pattern but, all of a sudden, she got suspicious...

Kid: Hey, wait a minute, this one is the same as the other one!

She started making marks while she counted the points and, sure enough, it was the same star twice. It felt like the perfect imperfection for this lesson. I always love it when kids discover anomalies or mistakes. It means they're really paying attention.

By the time we got to the 18 star she exclaimed: "All these stars are making my head hurt!" but I encouraged her to persevere. After she found the first triangle (with the pink dots) I asked her if she knew enough now to predict the placement of each consecutive color. She put down the orange and right away saw that, if you go in the same direction (in this case counter clockwise) three dots of a new color always go counter clockwise to the previous color.

Even though I had said we could be done after the 18 star, we did get to the 21 star and it's good we did because I got to make another interesting mistake. For this last star I wanted to show her a different color pattern I had noticed. Since the previous star (18) needed six colors to highlight each individual triangle, I had her pick one more color for a total of seven. Then I asked her to see what would happen if she just put down one color at a time in a sequence until she had used all seven colors. All was going smoothly -- she put down seven colored dots on the points starting with light blue, and I drew two little lines to show where the seven started and ended. Then she repeated the same pattern (this time she went clockwise, I think) two more times.

It was at that point that I realized something was amiss; that we had visually shown three groups of seven instead of seven groups of three which was one of the main goals of this lesson. A minor point, but one made much more obvious using the colors, and a result I am still puzzling over.

Here's the whole sheet where we left off:

I think my pictures tell a pretty good story, but in the moment there was some major flow happening. The colors are not just beautiful visual additions to the designs but also really effective in illustrating the structure, combinations and multiples within the stars. Overall, I'm pretty proud of myself for setting up and guiding this little exploration, but I would love (love!) to hear your feedback on this activity and any ideas you have on what we could do next.

________________

Malke Rosenfeld delights in creating rich environments in which children and their adults can explore, make, play, and talk math based on their own questions and inclinations. Her upcoming book, Math on the Move: Engaging Students in Whole Body Learning, will be published by Heinemann in Fall 2016.

ReplyDelete"... we had visually shown three groups of seven instead of seven groups of three ... a result I am still puzzling over."We teachers tend to gloss over the commutative property and take it for granted, when it should be a cause for wonder. :)

A group of 7 was a rainbow sequence. A group of three is the three dots of the same color that form a triangle. Right? So you can 'see' the same thing two ways.

ReplyDeleteSue, maybe it's just harder to see the seven groups of three because they're so spread out? I guess my point was I switched gears mid-way through -- instead of focusing on 3's I focused on the number of colored pencils she needed and predicting the pattern. After all I've read about multiplication being about groups of things, I can't imagine that there were really 'three groups of seven' in that design, or if there was what they would be exactly.

ReplyDeleteAnd, Denise, I think it's a cause for wonder b/c I really and truly am understanding all this for the first time. You know, 'the lights are on, my eyes are open' ;-)

maybe its that you have three groups of seven of each angle? meaning, each triangle has three angles, call them a,b,c

Deleteso you have 7 groups of angle a's, 7 groups of angle b's and 7 of angle c's?

I love this and I'm so inspired to set up a star activity with my 7 yo :)

Great stuff, Malke. I quite love that you switched to thinking about the seven instead of the three. Makes perfect sense. The whole process helps make the connection between seeing the 3s in the (6,2) star [thats the number of points and jump number notation] and the 7s n the (21,7). It's this ability to flip back and forth that makes it easy to snap between multiplication facts and division, in the future say.

ReplyDeleteI love how you have an idea and you dive in and see where the kid takes it. Lovely stuff, and I can't wait to see what you do with the star pack I'm sending you. (as you know of course)

Paul, where can I go to read more about all this stuff you've been telling me about stars, the notation, etc. I think your star pack (!) will help a lot, but I think I really need to study on this one! ;-)

ReplyDeleteExcellent activity. Thank you for sharing. Can't wait to share this with my nephews.

ReplyDeleteHiya! Does the frequency of updating your website depend on something or you compose articles when you have a specific mood or free time on that? Thank you so much in advance for your reply.

ReplyDelete